![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This week's lesson focused on understanding how children
think and learn and applied it to the development of a home management
system. Click Here for details.
Bonus -- Essay on Adolescent Development -- Click Here. How Children's thinking Develops Cognitive Development Cognitive development is the process of how thinking changes with time. It is more than just learning new facts. It includes how the facts are used and integrated into a person's understanding of the world. Discussing cognitive development in children generally ends up examining Jean Piaget's model. In this model, Piaget claims learning occurs as people
adapt to changes in their perception of the world around us through two
mechanisms. Assimilation occurs when new information about the world is
fit into existing information and beliefs. Accommodation occurs when current
organizations of information must be shifted to incorporate the new information.
Over time, thought is organized into some smoothly functioning cognitive
system.
Because most elementary school aged children are in the two middle stages, it is useful to more closely examine the characteristics of those two stages.
Cognitive Development in Formal Operational Thought In adolescents, at the same time the body is changing, the mind is changing too. "The child who could reason logically about real world problems becomes the adolescent who can think systematically and abstractly about worlds that do not even exist or propositions that flatly contradict reality" (Sigelman & Shaffer, 1991, p 574). It is during the period of adolescence that Piaget's formal operational thought stage is reached. One primary difference between formal operational thought and concrete operational thought (the stage that Piaget places before formal operational thought) is the degree of abstractness the adolescent can handle (Muuss, 1996). The presence of this higher level of think is in part indicated by increases in verbal problem solving ability. Where before, in concrete operational stage, it would be necessary to see concrete examples to solve certain problems, the formal operational thinker can solve them merely by hear the verbal presentation. The abstract nature of adolescent thought also points to the presence of formal operational thinking. There is also a tendency to think about the process of thought itself (Santrock, 1998). Adolescents are no longer limited to concrete experiences
as basis of their thought. They can deal with hypothetical cases, "what
if's," and make-believe (Santrock, 1998). They develop the capacity to
systematically form and test hypotheses. They learn to understand abstract
theories and can grasp philosophy (Sigelman & Shaffer, 1991). As they
develop this ability, the complexity of their abstractions increases. In
the end, when the process has reached completion the young adult has developed
some means of organizing systems of abstractions (Newton, 1995).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||